Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  •  DensityParam_Validation_Disabled_AtmosDensity [no error or exception] - obsolete; deleted
  •  FMParams_Validation_Disabled_Acceleration [no error or exception] - obsolete; deleted
  •  FMParams_Validation_Disabled_AccelerationX [no error or exception] - obsolete; deleted
  •  FMParams_Validation_Disabled_AccelerationY [no error or exception] - obsolete; deleted
  •  FMParams_Validation_Disabled_AccelerationZ [no error or exception] - obsolete; deleted
  •  FindEvents_ControlFlow_While [GMT-5361] - fixed, shortened test and updated tolerance
  •  Ephem_GMAT_SPK_60sec_backward [failed reading state 1/15 from SPK] [GMT-5286] - the 2nd state isn't being read
  •  Ephem_GMAT_SPK_DefaultIntegrationStep_User_Defined_LagrangeOrder [failed reading state 1/19 from SPK] [GMT-5286] - the 2nd state isn't being read
  •  Events_ContactLocator_EarthTransit [diff # events] - fixed truth data
  •  Events_ContactLocator_OccultingBodies_Multiple [diff # events] - corrected script SPK consistency issue & updated truth
  •  Events_EclipseLocator_MarsLong [start diff = 0.001006s (mars/9)] - updated tolerance
  •  Events_TESS_Optimize_TwoStage_FromLaunch_master_03b4b32/Events_ContactLocator_TESS.report [start diff = 3.279996s (event 2125)]
  •  Events_TESS_Optimize_TwoStage_FromLaunch_master_03b4b32/Events_EclipseLocator_TESS.report [start diff = 1.161993s (earth/15)] - updated tolerance
  •  FindEvents_ControlFlow_For [diff occ bodies] [GMT-5360]
  •  FindEvents_ControlFlow_Target [diff # events for earth]

Summary

  • Looked through all tests; closed the checked ones above.
  • For the SPK tests, the first and last state are being thrown out, so this is an error reading the second state. Need some sanity checking on the generated ephems.
  • TESS ContactLocator tess failed by 3s, on the order as seen by other high-orbit tests. Regenerated truth data using Matlab. Test takes a long time to run, so waiting to confirm.
  • ControlFlow_For is a multi-chunked report that the comparator seems to have trouble with. Will verify manually.
  • ControlFlow_Target may just be a bad test - it fails because there aren't enough points in the last iteration to write a valid ephem segment.

 

RQ

Case By Case Analysis

GMATFunction_ACE_impulsive_493_Global_Subscribers_User_Defined_Parameters       

...